Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Autonomie

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/filmuniversitaet/detail.action?docID=5763592

Bradfield, O. M. (2021). Waving away waivers: an obligation to contribute to ‘herd knowledge’ for data linkage research? Research Ethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211058311

Coughlin, S. S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1992). Ethics, Scientific Validity, and the Design of Epidemiologic Studies. Epidemiology, 3(4), 343–347. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org.emedien.ub.uni-muenchen.de/stable/3702736

Dingwall, R., Iphofen, R., Lewis, J., Oates, J., & Emmerich, N. (2017). Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences. In R. I. FAcSS (Ed.), Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity (Vol. 1, pp. 111–123). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001010

Dreyer, S., & Schulz, W. (2018). Was bringt die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung für automatisierte Entscheidungssysteme? https://doi.org/10.11586/2018011

Dugosh, K. L., Festinger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., & Clements, N. T. (2014). Developing an index to measure the voluntariness of consent to research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(4), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614544100

Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Graf von Kielmansegg, S. (2017). Forschungslegitimation durch Einwilligung: Zwischen Autonomie und staatlicher Regulierung. Forschung, 3+4, 95–100.

Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288

Hammersley, M. (2019). Ethics of Ethnography. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_50-1

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Losch, M. E. (2008). Informed Consent. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Vol. 1, pp. 335–337). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n223

Meier, A. (2018). Alles eine Frage der digitalen Autonomie? Die Rolle von Autonomie in der digitalen Kommunikation für psychologische Grundbedürfnisse und psychische Gesundheit im Alltag. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 66(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2018-4-407

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Oates, J. (2019). Research Ethics, Children, and Young People. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_28-1

Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2

Roache, R. (2014). Why is informed consent important? J Med Ethics, 40(7), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102264

Roffee, J. A., & Waling, A. (2017). Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying. Research Ethics, 13(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116658693

Rothstein, M. A. (2015). Ethical Issues in Big Data Health Research: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(2), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12258

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group.

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Sutrop, M., & Louk, K. (2020). Informed Consent and Ethical Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_8-1

Tännsjö, T. (2014). Utilitarianism and informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 445. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101206

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Wagner, G. G. (2017). Anmerkungen zu den vielfältigen Dimensionen einer Forschungsethik in den Sozial-, Verhaltens- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 265). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.10

Ziegele, M., & Quiring, O. (2011). Privacy in Social Network Sites. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online (pp. 175–189). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_13