Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Ethikgutachten

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Buyx, A. (2017). Forschungsethische Implikationen von Big Data im Gesundheitsbereich: die Stellungnahme des Deutschen Ethikrats von November 2017. Forschung, 3+4, 77–84.

Carniel, J., Hickey, A., Southey, K., Brömdal, A., Crowley-Cyr, L., Eacersall, D., Farmer, W., Gehrmann, R., Machin, T., & Pillay, Y. (2022). The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes. Research Ethics, 174701612211472. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147202

Colnerud, G. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study. Research Ethics, 10(4), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016114552339

Hunter, D. (2007). The Roles of Research Ethics Committees: Implications for Membership. Research Ethics, 3(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610700300110

Kritikos, M. (2019). Research Ethics Governance. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_1-1

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2009). Ethics Review in a Developing Country: A Survey of South African Social Scientists’ Experiences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.69

Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/019384102236520

Spellecy, R., Eve, A. M., Connors, E. R., Shaker, R., & Clark, D. C. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618780803

Tsan, M.-F., & Van Hook, H. (2022). Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(4), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221094407