Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Experiment

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Aryani, A. (2015). Data Description Registry Interoperability WG: Interlinking Method and Specification of Cross-Platform Discovery. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00003

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Bewertung von Untersuchungsideen. In J. Bortz & N. Döring (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (p. pp 43-48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_2

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Testethik. In J. Bortz & N. Döring (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (p. pp 192-193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_4

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Connors, E. C., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2019). How Transparency Affects Survey Responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(Suppl. 1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz013

Dietrich, J. (2005). Ethisch-Philosophische Grundlagenkompetenzen: ein Modell für Studierende und Lehrende. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, p. pp.15-32). LIT Verlag. https://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/978-3-8258-6780-3

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006

Freedland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1992). Data management and accountability in behavioral and biomedical research. American Psychologist, 47(5), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.5.640

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Geier, C., Adams, R. B., Mitchell, K. M., & Holtz, B. E. (2021). Informed Consent for Online Research—Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646211020160. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211020160

Hartmann, D. J., & McLaughlin, O. (2018). Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618800208

Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2008). Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense. Ethics & Behavior, 18(1), 59–92. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701712990

Iphofen, R. (2020). Ethical Issues in Research Methods. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_54-1

Johns, M. D., Chen, S.-L., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Crowell, T. L. (2004). Surviving the IRB Review: Institutional Guidelines and Research Strategies. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (p. pp.105-124). P. Lang.

Jonas, H. (1969). Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (p. pp.11-18). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-4/philosophical-reflections-experimenting-human-subjects-hans-jonas?context=ubx&refId=915ef2d1-ffbb-458a-8294-e915b2643a4d

Jouhki, J., Lauk, E., Penttinen, M., Sormanen, N., & Uskali, T. (2016). Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.579

Keith, P. K., & Fairfield, J. A. T. (2017). Ethics of Empirical Research. In J. Matthes, R. F. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (p. pp 1-17). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0086

Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M. (2009). The ethics of suicide research: The views of ethics committee members. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 30(1), 13–19. APA PsycArticles. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13

Lewis, J. (2019). Experimental Design. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_19-1

Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

Murray, T. H. (1980). Learning to deceive. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 367–370). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-36/learning-deceive-thomas-murray

Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846

Perrault, E. K., & Nazione, S. A. (2016). Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616654610

Petillion, W., Melrose, S., Moore, S. L., & Nuttgens, S. (2017). Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), pp 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677635

Recuber, T. (2015). From obedience to contagion: Discourses of power in Milgram, Zimbardo, and the Facebook experiment. Research Ethics, 12(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115579533

Sonenshein, S., & DeCelles, K. (2017). Mixed Methodologies, Full-Cycle Research, and the Shortcomings of Behavioral Ethics. In P. H. Werhane, R. E. Freeman, & S. Dmytriyev (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility (1st ed., pp. 191–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584385.013

Taylor, S. J. (1987). Observing abuse: professional ethics and personal morality in field research. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 371–388). Ashgate. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00988991.pdf

Walzenbach, S., Burton, J., Couper, M. P., Crossley, T. F., & JÄckle, A. (2023). Experiments on Multiple Requests for Consent to Data Linkage in Surveys. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 11(3), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab053

Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2018). Framing “Deception” and “Covertness” in Research: Do Milgram, Humphreys, and Zimbardo Justify Regulating Social Science Research Ethics? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3102

Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford prison experiment. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 353–366). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-35/ethics-intervention-human-psychological-research-special-reference-stanford-prison-experiment-philip-zimbardo?context=ubx&refId=36a7e77e-65dc-45cf-b50a-47a41e9016db

Experiment

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende