Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Lesbarkeit

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Biggs, J. S., & Marchesi, A. (2015). Information for consent: Too long and too hard to read. Research Ethics, 11(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115583381

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Nelson, L. R., Stupiansky, N. W., & Ott, M. A. (2016). The Influence of Age, Health Literacy, and Affluence on Adolescents’ Capacity to Consent to Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616636232

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report