Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Review

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707

Bischof, S., Lengerer, F., & Meyer, F. (2022). Interaktionsspuren im digitalen Raum: Zum Spannungsfeld von Öffentlichkeit und Anonymität in qualitativen Forschungsprozessen. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 23 No. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-23.3.3893

Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069

Buchanan, E. A., & Hvizdak, E. E. (2009). Online Survey Tools: Ethical and Methodological Concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 4(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.37

Charlesworth, A. (2012). Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Ethical Review Committees. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 85–103. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.637572

Craft, J. L. (2013). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9

Edward, M., & Greenough, C. (2019). Queer Literacy. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_57-1

Favaretto, M., De Clercq, E., Briel, M., & Elger, B. S. (2020). Working Through Ethics Review of Big Data Research Projects: An Investigation into the Experiences of Swiss and American Researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620935223

Freedland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1992). Data management and accountability in behavioral and biomedical research. American Psychologist, 47(5), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.5.640

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Haaser, T., Bouteloup, V., Berdaï, D., & Saux, M.-C. (2022). The Multidimensional Nature of Research Ethics: Letters Issued by a French Research Ethics Committee Included Similar Proportions of Ethical and Scientific Queries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221093218

Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2008). Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense. Ethics & Behavior, 18(1), 59–92. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701712990

Hine, C. (2021). Evaluating the prospects for university-based ethical governance in artificial intelligence and data-driven innovation. 17(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211022790

Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720982012. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Iphofen, R. (2017). The ‘Ethics Rupture’ and the New Brunswick Declaration. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 151–155). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001012

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Crowell, T. L. (2004). Surviving the IRB Review: Institutional Guidelines and Research Strategies. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (p. pp.105-124). P. Lang.

Kritikos, M. (2017). Safeguarding Research Integrity in Europe: An Object of Increasing Legal Attention. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 199–210). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001016

Roberts, J., Overstreet, K., Hendrick, R., & Mahar, J. (2020). Peer Review in Scholarly Journal Publishing. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_5-1

Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Verbeke, K., Krawczyk, T., Baeyens, D., Piasecki, J., & Borry, P. (2023). Informed Consent and Debriefing When Deceiving Participants: A Systematic Review of Research Ethics Guidelines. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 155626462311734. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646231173477

Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsey, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). Oxford University Press.

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). (2017). WZB Research Ethics Policy and Procedures. Forschung, 3+4, 107–112.