Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Peer-Review

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

ALLEA, A. E. A. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf

Bos, J. (2020). Research ethics for students in the social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6

Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … de Vreese, C. (2020). An Agenda for Open Science in Communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052

Dougherty, M. V. (2021). The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics, 17(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211018257

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. (2013). Case Studies for Ethics in Academic Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452269986

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Guta, A., & Voronka, J. (2019). Ethical Issues in Community-Based, Participatory, and Action-Oriented Forms of Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_24-1

Hartmann, D. J., & McLaughlin, O. (2018). Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618800208

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Koch, T., & Geiß, S. (2019). Wie zuverlässig ist das Peer-Review-Verfahren? Eine Untersuchung der Interrater-Reliabilität von Gutachter*innen auf DGPuK-Tagungen. Studies in Communication and Media, 8, 203–235. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-2-203

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2015). Measuring voluntariness of consent to research: an instrument review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615571552

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1

Raykov, M. (2020). Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119893461

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.

Roache, R. (2014). Why is informed consent important? J Med Ethics, 40(7), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102264

Roberts, J., Overstreet, K., Hendrick, R., & Mahar, J. (2020). Peer Review in Scholarly Journal Publishing. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_5-1

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Spellecy, R., Eve, A. M., Connors, E. R., Shaker, R., & Clark, D. C. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618780803

Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5