Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Risiken

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Askanius, T., Malmö University, F. of C. and S., Originator, Malmö University, S. of A. and C. (K3), Originator, & Malmö University, (Re)thinking Democracy (REDEM), Originator. (2019). Studying the Nordic Resistance Movement : three urgent questions for researchers of contemporary neo-Nazis and their media practices. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 878–888. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719831181

Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611

Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369

Dwork, C. (2014). Differential Privacy: A Cryptographic Approach to Private Data Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 296-322). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.018

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Gorup, M. (2019). Ethics of Observational Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_20-1

Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3

Heimer, C. A., & Petty, J. (2010). Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454

Heise, N. (2011). „Alles neu macht das Netz?“ – Ethik der Internetforschung Eine qualitativ-heuristische Befragungsstudie. In T. Köhler (Ed.), Wissensgemeinschaften : Digitale Medien – Öffnung und Offenheit in Forschung und Lehre. (p. pp.339-341). Waxmann Verlag. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-76473

Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F., & Auld, G. (2013). Silences of ethical practice: dilemmas for researchers using social media. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(6), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.805656

Hunter, D. (2007). The Roles of Research Ethics Committees: Implications for Membership. Research Ethics, 3(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610700300110

Iphofen, R. (2020). Regulating Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_52-1

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Kämper, E. (2016). Risiken sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung? Forschungsethik, Datenschutz und Schutz von Persönlichkeitsrechten in den Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 255. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.21

Karr, A. F., & Reiter, J. P. (2014). Using Statistics to Protect Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 276-295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.017

Kavouras, P., & Charitidis, C. A. (2019). Dual Use in Modern Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_7-1

Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological Research Online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117. ERIC. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ684234&site=ehost-live

Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M. (2009). The ethics of suicide research: The views of ethics committee members. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 30(1), 13–19. APA PsycArticles. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13

Losch, M. E. (2008). Informed Consent. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Vol. 1, pp. 335–337). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n223

Marwick, A. E., Blackwell, L., & Lo, K. (2016). Best Practices for Conducting Risky Research and Protecting Yourself from Online Harassment. Data & Society Research Institute.

Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971

Nind, M., Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., & Crow, G. (2012). Methodological innovation and research ethics: forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qualitative Research, 13(6), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112455042

O’Sullivan, R. (2020). Older Citizens’ Involvement in Aging Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_29-2

Resnik, D. B. (2005). Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010470

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Roffee, J. A., & Waling, A. (2017). Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying. Research Ethics, 13(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116658693

Schäwel, J., Frener, R., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2021). Learning by doing oder doing by learning? Die Wechselwirkung zwischen Online- Privatheitskompetenz und Datenschutzverhalten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 69(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-2-221

Schwartz, R. (2009). On Ethics in Social Science Research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Spear (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 189–197). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n12

Sims, J. (2019). Ethical Research with Hard-to-Reach Groups. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_32-1

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2017). The Ethics of Using Social Media Data in Research: A New Framework. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 189–208). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002008

Zainab, S., Mansoor, M., & Gul, U. (2023). Self-Restrictions among Media Researchers in Global South and Regional Priorities: Challenges for Freedom of Expression and Ethical Research. Comunicazioni Sociali, 2, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000186