Ethikkommissionen Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.
Altmeppen, K.-D. (2016). Ethik ist kein Springteufel. Warum Ethik und Kritik in der Wissenschaft keine Gegensätze sind. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-1-114 Barnes, S. B. (2004). Issues of Attribution and Identification in Online Social Research. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 203–222). P. Lang. Bleisch, B., Huppenbauer, M., & Baumberger, C. (2021). Ethische Entscheidungsfindung: Ein Handbuch für die Praxis (3., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Nomos Verlag. Borrett, D. S., Sampson, H., & Cavoukian, A. (2017). Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal. Research Ethics, 13(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116673135 Bosk, C. L., & De Vries, R. G. (2004). Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204266913 Boyd, D. (2016). Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us. Research Ethics, 12(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115583379 Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006 Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109 Brandenburg, S., Minge, M., Cymek, D. H., & Zeidler, L. (2017). Ethische Aspekte in der Forschung zu Mensch-Maschine-Systemen – Einblicke in die Arbeit einer Ethik-Kommission. Forschung, 3+4, 101–112. Brey, P., Shelley-Egan, C., Rodrigues, R., & Jansen, P. (2017). The Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation – A Reflection on the State of the Art (Based on Findings of the SATORI Project). In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 185–198). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001015 Brown, N. (2023). Research ethics in a changing social sciences landscape. Research Ethics, 19(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221141011 Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069 Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (Ed.). (2020). Praxisleitfaden für Integrität und Ethik in der Wissenschaft. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. https://forschungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_forschungsservice/Formulare_Info_Stipendien/Praxisleitfaden_fuer_Integritaet_und_Ethik_in_der_Wissenschaft_Stand_29-9-2020_Final.pdf Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404 Cairns, A. C., Linville, C., Garcia, T., Bridges, B., Tanoa, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2021). A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct. 17(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211042658 Carniel, J., Hickey, A., Southey, K., Brömdal, A., Crowley-Cyr, L., Eacersall, D., Farmer, W., Gehrmann, R., Machin, T., & Pillay, Y. (2022). The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes. Research Ethics, 174701612211472. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147202 Carpentier, R., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Protecting Participants in Clinical Trials Through Research Ethics Review. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_3-1 Carter, C. J., Koene, A., Perez, E., Statache, R., Adolphs, S., O’Malley, C., Rodden, T., & McAuley, D. (2016). Understanding academic attitudes towards the ethical challenges posed by social media research. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874268 Charlesworth, A. (2012). Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Ethical Review Committees. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 85–103. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.637572 Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.678 Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539 Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369 Crawford, S., Hokke, S., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., & Hackworth, N. (2019). “It’s not black and white”: Public health researchers’ and ethics committees’ perceptions of engaging research participants online. Internet Research, 29(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2017-0278 Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010. Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich Dove, E. S., & Garattini, C. (2018). Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition. Research Ethics, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117711972 Elgesem, D. (2016). Consent and information – ethical considerations when conducting research on social media. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 14–34). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3 Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011 Ess, C. (2016). New selves, new research ethics? In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 48–76). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3 Ess, C. M. (2019). Internet Research Ethics and Social Media. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_12-1 Favaretto, M., De Clercq, E., Briel, M., & Elger, B. S. (2020). Working Through Ethics Review of Big Data Research Projects: An Investigation into the Experiences of Swiss and American Researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620935223 Ferretti, A., Ienca, M., Rivas Velarde, M., Hurst, S., & Vayena, E. (2021). The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethic, 1–15, 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211053538 Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students. Ethics & Behavior, 19(6), 496–518. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/10508420903275283 Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Participatory Research: Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7 Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305 Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081 Glasziou, P., & Chalmers, I. (2004). Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ, 328, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121 Goerge, L. (2020). The Ethics of Research and Indigenous Peoples. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_31-1 Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360 Haaser, T., Bouteloup, V., Berdaï, D., & Saux, M.-C. (2022). The Multidimensional Nature of Research Ethics: Letters Issued by a French Research Ethics Committee Included Similar Proportions of Ethical and Scientific Queries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221093218 Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288 Hammersley, M. (2017). Communitarian Principles That Will Increase the Damage Done by Ethical Regulation? A Response to ‘The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research’ by David Carpenter. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 19–27). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001002 Heimer, C. A., & Petty, J. (2010). Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454 Hennell, K., Limmer, M., & Piacentini, M. (2020). Ethical Dilemmas Using Social Media in Qualitative Social Research: A Case Study of Online Participant Observation. Sociological Research Online, 25(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419888933 Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510 Hine, C. (2021). Evaluating the prospects for university-based ethical governance in artificial intelligence and data-driven innovation. 17(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211022790 Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Bennetts, S. K., Nicholson, J. M., Keyzer, P., Lucke, J., Zion, L., & Crawford, S. B. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619854629 Hunter, D. (2007). The Roles of Research Ethics Committees: Implications for Membership. Research Ethics, 3(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610700300110 Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005 Iphofen, R. (2017). Achieving Consensus in Research Ethics: An Interim Conclusion and Some Recommendations. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 211–225). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001017 Iphofen, R. (2017). The ‘Ethics Rupture’ and the New Brunswick Declaration. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 151–155). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001012 Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7 Israel, M. (2019). Organizing and Contesting Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_63-1 Jackson, J. L., & Larson, E. (2016). Prevalence and commonalities of informed consent templates for biomedical research. Research Ethics, 12(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649995 Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423 Kämper, E. (2016). Risiken sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung? Forschungsethik, Datenschutz und Schutz von Persönlichkeitsrechten in den Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 255. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.21 Kaewkungwal, J., & Adams, P. (2019). Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand. Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Office of Research Services, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 26(3), 176–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190 Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596 Löfström, E. (2012). Students’ Ethical Awareness and Conceptions of Research Ethics. Centre for the Research and Development of Higher Education of Helsinki, 22(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.679136 Laas, K., Taylor, S., Miller, C. Z., Brey, E. M., & Hildt, E. (2021). Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1910503 Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M. (2009). The ethics of suicide research: The views of ethics committee members. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 30(1), 13–19. APA PsycArticles. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13 Lob-Hüdepohl, A. (2021). Begutachten – Beraten – Beteiligen. Zum normativen Anforderungsprofil einer Forschungsethikkommission. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 81–99). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16 Lombardo, G. (2017). The Social Sciences and Ethical Protocols and Standards for Research in Social Sciences Today. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 177–184). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001014 MacNeill, K., Bolt, B., Barrett, E., McPherson, M., Sierra, M., Miller, S., Ednie-Brown, P., & Wilson, C. (2021). An ethical engagement: creative practice research, the academy and professional codes of conduct. Research Ethics, 17(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915950 Macdonald, S. (2017). Embedded Ethics and Research Integrity: A Response to ‘The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research’ by David Carpenter. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 29–35). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001003 Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2017). Overcoming ethical barriers to research. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739938 Makola, Z., & Ntoyanto-Tyatyantsi, N. (2023). Post Graduate Students’ Experiences with Research Ethics: A South African Perspective. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646231188004. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646231188004 Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2009). Ethics Review in a Developing Country: A Survey of South African Social Scientists’ Experiences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.69 Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (AoIR Ethical Decision-Making, p. 19). http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A Delicate Balancing Act: Negotiating with Gatekeepers for Ethical Research When Researching Minority Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102 Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. LEI. https://edepot.wur.nl/216589 Mertens, D. M. (2018). Ethics of Qualitative Data Collection. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 33–48). SAGE Publications Ltd. Miser, W. F. (2005). Educational research--to IRB, or not to IRB? Family Medicine, 37(3), 168–173. Mooney-Somers, J., & Olsen, A. (2017). Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677636 Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023 Msoroka, M. S., & Amundsen, D. (2018). One size fits not quite all: Universal research ethics with diversity. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739939 Murdock, M., & Erickson, S. (2023). Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research. Research Ethics, 174701612311666. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231166600 Ntseane, P. G. (2009). The Ethics of the Researcher-Subject Relationship: Experiences From the Field. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 295–307). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n19 Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/019384102236520 Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.3.397 Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1 Resnik, D. B. (2005). Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010470 Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404 Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177 Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005 Samuel, G., Ahmed, W., Kara, H., Jessop, C., Quinton, S., & Sanger, S. (2018). Is It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773 Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3 Schlütz, D., Zillich, A. F., & Roehse, E.-M. (2023). Ethikkommissionen in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft: Qualitätssicherung oder “Forschungsverhinderungsanstalt”? Hochschulmanagement, 18(1), 31–37. Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2019). Ethics Instruction Increases Graduate Students’ Responsible Conduct of Research Knowledge but not Moral Reasoning. 268–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903190323 Schwartz, R. (2009). On Ethics in Social Science Research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Spear (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 189–197). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n12 Sellers, C., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. (2019). Reasoning “Uncharted Territory”: Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619837088 Slattery, M., Ehrlich, C., Norwood, M., Amsters, D., & Allen, G. (2023). Disability Research in Australia: Deciding to Be a Research Participant and the Experience of Participation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 18(1–2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221147350 Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004 Speiglman, R., & Spear, P. (2009). The Role of Institutional Review Boards: Ethics: Now You See Them, Now You Don’t. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 121–134). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-handbook-of-social-research-ethics/n8.xml Spellecy, R., Eve, A. M., Connors, E. R., Shaker, R., & Clark, D. C. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618780803 Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group. Stodden, V. (2014). Enabling Reproducibility in Big Data Research: Balancing Confidentiality and Scientific Transparency. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 112-132). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.007 Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767 Strobel, A., Zeiler, A., & Schaar, K. (2022). Der Stand der Dinge zur forschungsethischen Begutachtung in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Forschenden. Berlin: Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), RatSWD Working Paper 278/2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.67 Tarboush, N. A., Alkayed, Z., Alzoubi, K. H., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2020). The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(121). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5 Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang. Tsan, M.-F., & Van Hook, H. (2022). Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(4), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221094407 Tully, M., Vail, A., Roberts, S., Brabin, L., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 3.: Sampling and Data Analysis. Research Ethics, 5(3), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500313 Utaaker Segadal, K., Fossheim, H., & Ingierd, H. (2016). Possibilities and limitations of Internet research: A legal framework. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 35–47). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3 Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212 Vitak, J., Proferes, N., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2017). Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617725200 Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Grundsätze, Debatten und offene Fragen. In R. M´Bayo, P. Narimani, & H. Von Unger (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 15-39). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_2 Von Unger, H., & Simon, D. (2016). Ethikkommissionen in den Sozialwissenschaften - Historische Entwicklungen und Internationale Kontroversen (RatSWD Working Paper 253). German Data Forum (RatSWD). https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rswrswwps/rswwps253.htm Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719 Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsey, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). Oxford University Press. Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731 Weber, D. (2021). Forschungsprozesse als ethische Lernprozesse. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 61–80). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16 Wilkinson, A., Slack, C., Thabethe, S., & Salzwedel, J. (2022). “It’s Almost as if Stakeholder Engagement is the Annoying ‘Have-to-do’… ”: Can Ethics Review Help Address the “3 Ts” of Tokenism, Toxicity, and Tailoring in Stakeholder Engagement? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221078415 Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage. Wood, L., & Kahts-Kramer, S. (2023). ‘But how will you ensure the objectivity of the researcher?’ Guidelines to address possible misconceptions about the ethical imperatives of community-based research. Research Ethics, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221135882 Zimmer, M. (2018). Addressing Conceptual Gaps in Big Data Research Ethics: An Application of Contextual Integrity. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 205630511876830. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768300 franzke, aline shakti, Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. M. (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers.