Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Verantwortung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

ALLEA, A. E. A. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf

Acquisti, A. (2014). The Economics and Behavioral Economics of Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 76-95). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.005

Askanius, T., Malmö University, F. of C. and S., Originator, Malmö University, S. of A. and C. (K3), Originator, & Malmö University, (Re)thinking Democracy (REDEM), Originator. (2019). Studying the Nordic Resistance Movement : three urgent questions for researchers of contemporary neo-Nazis and their media practices. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 878–888. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719831181

Averbeck-Lietz, S., & Sanko, C. (2016). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 125–136). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01656-2_8

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., & Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (pp. 44–75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107590205

Baumrind, D. (1964). Psychology in action: some thoughts on the ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s Behavioral Study of Obedience. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 349–351). Ashgate.

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Bilke, N. (2010). Kriegsberichterstattung. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 442-453). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_30

Blay, A. D., Gooden, E. S., Mellon, M. J., & Stevens, D. E. (2018). The Usefulness of Social Norm Theory in Empirical Business Ethics Research: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3286-4

Bohrmann, T. (2010). Mediale Gewaltdarstellungen. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 417-423). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_27

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Testethik. In J. Bortz & N. Döring (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (p. pp 192-193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_4

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (Ed.). (2020). Praxisleitfaden für Integrität und Ethik in der Wissenschaft. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. https://forschungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_forschungsservice/Formulare_Info_Stipendien/Praxisleitfaden_fuer_Integritaet_und_Ethik_in_der_Wissenschaft_Stand_29-9-2020_Final.pdf

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Cairns, A. C., Linville, C., Garcia, T., Bridges, B., Tanoa, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2021). A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct. 17(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211042658

Clark, L. (2017). Ethics of Working with Vulnerable Populations. In C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–2). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0087

Colnerud, G. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study. Research Ethics, 10(4), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016114552339

Coughlin, S. S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1992). Ethics, Scientific Validity, and the Design of Epidemiologic Studies. Epidemiology, 3(4), 343–347. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org.emedien.ub.uni-muenchen.de/stable/3702736

Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010.

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2019). Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex (p. 31). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp.pdf

Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … de Vreese, C. (2020). An Agenda for Open Science in Communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052

Dobrick, F. M., Fischer, J., & Hagen, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Ethics for the Social Sciences and Humanities in Times of Mediatization and Digitization (1st ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658129088

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Ess, C. M. (2019). Internet Research Ethics and Social Media. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_12-1

Evans, N., Schmolmueller, A., Stolper, M., Inguaggiato, G., Hooghiemstra, A., Tokalic, R., Pizzolato, D., Foeger, N., Marušić, A., van Hoof, M., Lanzerath, D., Molewijk, B., Dierickx, K., & Widdershoven on, G. (2023). VIRT2UE: A European train-the-trainer programme for teaching research integrity. Research Ethics, 174701612311612. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231161267

Felaefel, M. F., Salem, M., Jaafar, R., Jassim, G., Edwards, H., Rashid-Doubell, F., Yousri, R., Ali, N. M., & Silverman, H. (2018). A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(1), 1-87. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9.

Ferretti, A., Ienca, M., Rivas Velarde, M., Hurst, S., & Vayena, E. (2021). The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethic, 1–15, 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211053538

Filipovic´, A., Klaus, E., & Strippel, C. (2016). Der Ethik-Kodex der DGPuK. Erläuterungen aus Anlass des Beitrags von Rudolf Stöber in M&K 4/2015. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-1-93

Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students. Ethics & Behavior, 19(6), 496–518. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/10508420903275283

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. (2013). Case Studies for Ethics in Academic Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452269986

Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006

Fraas, C., Meier, S., & Pentzold, C. (Eds.). (2012). Forschungsethik. In Online-Kommunikation (pp. 188–195). Oldenbourg Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486714814

Freedland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1992). Data management and accountability in behavioral and biomedical research. American Psychologist, 47(5), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.5.640

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Graumann, S. (2011). Forschungsethik. In M. Düwell, C. Hübenthal, & M. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbuch Ethik (p. pp 252-258). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05192-9_3

Greenwood, D., Stopczynski, A., Sweatt, B., Hardjono, T., & Pentland, A. (2014). The New Deal on Data: A Framework for Institutional Controls. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 192-210). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.012

Hagen, S., Bishop, E. L., Koščík, M., Vavra, M., Štebe, J., Ryan, L., Payne, E., Løvlie, A. G., Rød, L.-M., Straume, Ø., & Myhren, M. H. (2019). Report on legal and ethical framework and strategies related to access, use, re-use, dissemination and preservation of social media data (6.3; p. 47). SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.3-Report-on-legal-and-ethical-framework-and-strategies...__FINAL.pdf

Halford, S. (2017). The Ethical Disruptions of Social Media Data: Tales from the Field. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 13–26). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002001

Heesen, J. (Ed.). (2016). Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (1st ed.). J. B. Metzler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2008). Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense. Ethics & Behavior, 18(1), 59–92. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701712990

Hessler, G. (2012). Konstellationen von Wissenschaft und Praxis in der empirischen Sozialforschung. In K. Unzicker & G. Hessler (Eds.), Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis (pp. 157–177). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_8

Hufen, F. (2017). Wissenschaft in Freiheit und Verantwortung: Braucht Forschung Aufpasser? Forschung & Lehre, 118–120. https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/recht/braucht-forschung-aufpasser-153/

Iphofen, R. (2020). Acting Ethically and with Integrity for Research Subjects and Participants. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_55-1

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Israel, M. (2019). Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910096

Johns, M. D., Chen, S.-L., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.

Köhler, D. (2005). Problemfelder der Internet-Ethik. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch (pp. 219–228). LIT Verlag.

Kalichman, M. W., Devereaux, M. L., & Plemmons, D. K. (2022). A Course for Teaching and Learning About the Responsible Conduct of Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211047163

Kaufmann, K. (2018). Mit Kriegsflüchtlingen über ihre Smartphone-Nutzung auf der Flucht sprechen: Eine forschungsethische (Selbst-)Reflexion. In M. Prinzing, M. Schröder, & N. Köberer (Eds.), Migration, Integration, Inklusion. Medienethische Potenziale für die digitale Mediengesellschaft (pp. 135–150). Nomos.

Keith, P. K., & Fairfield, J. A. T. (2017). Ethics of Empirical Research. In J. Matthes, R. F. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (p. pp 1-17). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0086

Kerpen, D., Dorgeist, M., & Zantis, S. (2018). Intersecting the Digital Maze. Considering Ethics in Cloud-Based Services’ Research. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 143-152). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_15

Kingston, A. K. (2019). Feminist Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_64-1

Kirtley, O. J. (2022). Ethical Issues in Experience Sampling Method research. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies (pp. 91–100). Independently published.

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Kritikos, M. (2017). Safeguarding Research Integrity in Europe: An Object of Increasing Legal Attention. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 199–210). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001016

Löfström, E. (2012). Students’ Ethical Awareness and Conceptions of Research Ethics. Centre for the Research and Development of Higher Education of Helsinki, 22(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.679136

Laas, K., Taylor, S., Miller, C. Z., Brey, E. M., & Hildt, E. (2021). Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1910503

Lahman, M. K. E. (2017). Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/ethics-in-social-science-research/book249319

Lenk, H., & Maring, M. (2005). Wissenschaftsethik: Verantwortung der Wissenschaftler - Neutralität der Wissenschaften. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, pp. 153–166). LIT Verlag.

Leonelli, S., Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Fleming, L., & Williams, H. (2021). From FAIR data to fair data use: Methodological data fairness in health-related social media research. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211010310. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211010310

Luckner, A. (2005). Wofür haben Geisteswissenschaftler Verantwortung? In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch (pp. 84–95). LIT Verlag.

Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2017). Overcoming ethical barriers to research. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739938

Mackey, E. (2019). A Best Practice Approach to Anonymization. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_14-1

Maring, M. (2011). Forschungs- und Wissenschaftsethik. In R. Stoecker, C. Neuhäuser, M.-L. Raters, & F. Koberling (Eds.), Handbuch Angewandte Ethik (pp. 165–170). J. B. Metzler. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-476-05320-6_4

Maring, M. (Ed.). (2005). Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch. Lit.

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-017

McKee, H., & Porter, J. E. (2008). The Ethics of Digital Writing Research: A Rhetorical Approach. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 711–749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457031

Medvecky, F., & Leach, J. (2019). An Ethics of Science Communication. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32116-1

Mitcham, C., & Englehardt, E. E. (2019). Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(6), 1735–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Mooney-Somers, J., & Olsen, A. (2017). Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677636

Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Murdock, M., & Erickson, S. (2023). Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research. Research Ethics, 174701612311666. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231166600

Nairn, A., & Clarke, B. (2012). Researching Children: Are We Getting it Right?: A Discussion of Ethics. International Journal of Market Research, 54(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-2-177-198

Narimani, P. (2014). Zustimmung als Prozess: Informiertes Einverständnis in der Praxisforschung mit von Ausweisung bedrohten Drogenabhängigen. In R. M´Bayo (Ed.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 41-58). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_3

Neuendorf, C., Jansen, M., & Pegelow, L. (2020). Assessing the re-use potential of research data in empirical educational research (270/2020). RatSWD. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.49

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Newton, J. H. (2009). Visual Representation of People and Information: Translating Lives Into Numbers, Words, and Images as Research Data. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. pp 353-372). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n23

Nind, M., Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., & Crow, G. (2012). Methodological innovation and research ethics: forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qualitative Research, 13(6), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112455042

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/019384102236520

Ohm, P. (2014). Changing the Rules: General Principles for Data Use and Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 96-111). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.006

Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Phelan, S. K., & Kinsella, E. A. (2013). Picture This . . . Safety, Dignity, and Voice—Ethical Research With Children: Practical Considerations for the Reflexive Researcher. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412462987

Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1

Podschuweit, N. (2021). How ethical challenges of covert observations can be met in practice. Research Ethics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211008218

Poff, D. C., & Ginley, D. S. (2019). Publication Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_61-1

Prinzing, M., Schlütz, D., Kaufmann, K., Kreissl, J., & Rakebrand, T. (2020). Ethikkompetenz als Querschnittsaufgabe. Publizistik, 65, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00578-4

Rakebrand, T. (2019). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik als Teilbereich kritischen Denkens: Potenziale und Herausforderungen für die Lehrpraxis am Beispiel der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Die Hochschullehre: Interdisziplinäre Zeitschrift Für Studium Und Lehre, 5(1), 985−996. http://www.hochschullehre.org/wp-content/files/die_hochschullehre_2019_Centeno_Garcia_Kenneweg_Themenheft_Kritisch_Denken_Lernen.pdf

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.

Resnik, D. B. (2019). Stewardship of research resources. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1585819

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Roth, W.-M. (2018). A Transactional Approach to Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3061

Rothstein, M. A. (2015). Ethical Issues in Big Data Health Research: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(2), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12258

Sacco, D. F., Bruton, S. V., & Brown, M. (2018). In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834

Samuel, G., Ahmed, W., Kara, H., Jessop, C., Quinton, S., & Sanger, S. (2018). Is It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773

Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3

Scheliga, K., & Friesike, S. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2019). Ethics Instruction Increases Graduate Students’ Responsible Conduct of Research Knowledge but not Moral Reasoning. 268–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903190323

Schroeder, D. (2019). Benefit Sharing. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_11-1

Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004

Sponholz, G. (Ed.). (2019). Curriculum für Lehrveranstaltungen zur guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis - Erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung. https://ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-Curriculum-f%C3%BCr-Lehrveranstaltungen-zur-GWP.pdf

Stapf, I. (2010). Tod und Sterben. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 391-405). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_25

Steinhardt, I., Fischer, C., Heimstädt, M., Hirsbrunner, S. D., İkiz-Akıncı, D., Kressin, L., Kretzer, S., Möllenkamp, A., Porzelt, M., Rahal, R.-M., Schimmler, S., Wilke, R., & Wünsche, H. (2020). Das Öffnen und Teilen von Daten qualitativer Forschung: eine Handreichung (Weizenbaum Series, 6, p. S. 31). Berlin: Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - The German Internet Institute. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.ws/6

Stenmark, C. K., & Miller, R. (2021). A Little Goes a Long Way: Adapting an Ethics Training Program to Work for Smaller Universities. 16(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211007216

Stern, J. E., & Elliott, D. (1997). The ethics of scientific research : A guidebook for course development. 75. https://digital.stpetersburg.usf.edu/fac_publications/1910

Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group.

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Stewart, C. N., & Jr. Stewart, C. N. (2011). Chapter 1: Research Ethics: The Best Ethical Practices Produce the Best Science. In Research Ethics for Scientists: A Companion for Students (pp. 1–9). Wiley & Sons. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/dortmundtech/detail.action?docID=819276

Stodden, V. (2014). Enabling Reproducibility in Big Data Research: Balancing Confidentiality and Scientific Transparency. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 112-132). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.007

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Strandburg, K. (2014). Monitoring, Datafication, and Consent: Legal Approaches to Privacy in the Big Data Context. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 5-43). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107590205.003

Tagne, A. M., Cassina, N., Furgiuele, A., Storelli, E., Franca, M., & Consentino, M. (2020). Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy. Journal of Academic Ethics, 193–205. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-020-09359-0

Torrence, B. S., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Turner, M. R., Todd, E. M., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017). Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content. Accountability in Research, 24(5), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1276452

Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9

Watteler, O., & Ebel, T. (2019). Datenschutz im Forschungsdatenmanagement. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 57–80). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310378979

Williamson, V., Murphy, D., Castro, C., Vermetten, E., Jetly, R., & Greenberg, N. (2021). Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research. Research Ethics, 17(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120969743

Yeo-Teh, N. S. L., & Tang, B. L. (2021). Research ethics courses as a vaccination against a toxic research environment or culture. Research Ethics, 17(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120926686

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Zeni, J. (2009). Ethics and the ‘Personal’ in Action Research. In B. Somekh & S. E. Noffke (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 254–265). Sage.

Zwitter, A. (2014). Big Data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714559253

Verantwortung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende