Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Online-Forschung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Annette, M., & Elizabeth, B. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Askanius, T., Malmö University, F. of C. and S., Originator, Malmö University, S. of A. and C. (K3), Originator, & Malmö University, (Re)thinking Democracy (REDEM), Originator. (2019). Studying the Nordic Resistance Movement : three urgent questions for researchers of contemporary neo-Nazis and their media practices. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 878–888. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719831181

Bamdad, S., Finaughty, D. A., & Johns, S. E. (2022). ‘Grey areas’: ethical challenges posed by social media-enabled recruitment and online data collection in cross-border, social science research. 18(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045557

Barchard, K. A., & Williams, J. (2008). Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1111–1128. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1111

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Beninger, K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., & Silvester, H. (2014). Research using Social Media; Users’ Views. NatCen Social Research.

Bishop, L., & Gray, D. (2017). Ethical Challenges of Publishing and Sharing Social Media Research Data. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 159–188). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002007

Bober, M. (2004). Virtual Youth Research: An Exploration of Methodologies and Ethical Dilemmas from a British Perspective (p. 29). London School of Economics and Political Science. www.igi-global.com/chapter/virtual-youth-research/28305

Bowman, N. D., & Keene, J. R. (2018). A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices. Communication Research Reports, 35(4), 363–372. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273

Brotsky, S. R., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: a covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600

Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069

Buchanan, E. A., & Zimmer, M. (2021, January). Internet research ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A. N., & Reips, U.-D. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20459

Chua, S. M. (2021). Navigating conflict between research ethics and online platform terms and conditions: a reflective account. Research Ethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045526

Condie, J., Lean, G., & Wilcockson, B. (2017). The Trouble with Tinder: The Ethical Complexities of Researching Location-Aware Social Discovery Apps. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 135–158). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002006

Custers, B., Van der Hof, S., & Schermer, B. (2014). Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users: The Role of Informed Consent in Privacy Policies: Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI366

De Oliveira, L. L. H., Vissoci, J. R. N., Machado, W. de L., Rodrigues, C. G., & Limkakeng, A. T. (2017). Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617737163

Dobrick, F. M., Fischer, J., & Hagen, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Ethics for the Social Sciences and Humanities in Times of Mediatization and Digitization (1st ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658129088

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186

Elovici, Y., Fire, M., Herzberg, A., & Shulman, H. (2014). Ethical Considerations when Employing Fake Identities in Online Social Networks for Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9473-0

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Eynon, R., Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2009). New Techniques in Online Research: Challenges for Research Ethics. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 4(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140903000308

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Friedman, M. S., Chiu, C. J., Croft, C., Guadamuz, T. E., Stall, R., & Marshal, M. P. (2016). Ethics of Online Assent: Comparing Strategies to Ensure Informed Assent Among Youth. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615624809

Götze, A., & Wahl, A. (2020). Psychische Gesundheit: Eine heikle Thematik in der empirischen Umfrageforschung? : zur Validierung des Crosswise Modells. https://doi.org/10.18419/OPUS-11083

Geier, C., Adams, R. B., Mitchell, K. M., & Holtz, B. E. (2021). Informed Consent for Online Research—Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646211020160. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211020160

Ghandour, L., Yasmine, R., & El-Kak, F. (2013). Giving Consent without Getting Informed: A Cross-Cultural Issue in Research Ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.12

Ghanem, C., Eckl, M., & Lehmann, R. (2022). Big Data und Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit. EthikJournal, 1.

Giaxoglou, K. (2017). Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2/3), 229–250. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1037

Gilbert, S., Vitak, J., & Shilton, K. (2021). Measuring Americans’ Comfort With Research Uses of Their Social Media Data. Social Media + Society, 7(3), 20563051211033824. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033824

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Golla, S. J., Hofmann, H., & Bäcker, M. (2018). Connecting the Dots: Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung in Sozialen Online-Medien im Lichte von DS-GVO und BDSG-neu. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD, 42(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-018-0900-x

Grimm, P. (2013). Werte- und Normenaspekte der Online- Medien – Positionsbeschreibung einer digitalen Ethik. In B. Thomaß (Ed.), Normativität in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. (p. pp 371-395). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19015-0_18

Guhl, J., Marsh, O., & Tuck, H. (2022). Researching the Evolving Online Ecosystem: Barriers, Methods and Future Challenges. Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD).

Hagen, S., Bishop, E. L., Koščík, M., Vavra, M., Štebe, J., Ryan, L., Payne, E., Løvlie, A. G., Rød, L.-M., Straume, Ø., & Myhren, M. H. (2019). Report on legal and ethical framework and strategies related to access, use, re-use, dissemination and preservation of social media data (6.3; p. 47). SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.3-Report-on-legal-and-ethical-framework-and-strategies...__FINAL.pdf

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Heise, N. (2011). „Alles neu macht das Netz?“ – Ethik der Internetforschung Eine qualitativ-heuristische Befragungsstudie. In T. Köhler (Ed.), Wissensgemeinschaften : Digitale Medien – Öffnung und Offenheit in Forschung und Lehre. (p. pp.339-341). Waxmann Verlag. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-76473

Heise, N. (2013). “Doing it for real”. Authentizität als kommunikationsethische Voraussetzung onlinebasierter Forschung. In Emmer, M., Filipovic, A., Schmidt, J.-H., & Stapf, I. (Eds.), Echtheit, Wahrheit, Ehrlichkeit. Authentizität in der Online-Kommunikation. (pp. 88–109). Beltz Juventa. https://hamburgergarnele.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/seiten_88_109_heise.pdf

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ethik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 519–539). von Halem.

Hennell, K., Limmer, M., & Piacentini, M. (2020). Ethical Dilemmas Using Social Media in Qualitative Social Research: A Case Study of Online Participant Observation. Sociological Research Online, 25(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419888933

Hesse-Biber, S., & Griffin, A. J. (2013). Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812451791

Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Quin, N., Bennetts, S. K., Win, H. Y., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., & Crawford, S. B. (2018). Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572

Hollingshead, W., Quan-Haase, A., & Chen, W. (2021). Ethics and privacy in computational social science. In U. Engel, A. Quan-Haase, S. X. Liu, & L. Lyberg, Handbook of Computational Social Science, Volume 1 (pp. 171–185). Routledge.

Iphofen, R. (2017). Conclusion: Guiding the Ethics of Online Social Media Research – Adaptation or Renovation? In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 237–242). Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S2398-601820180000002002

Johns, M. D., Chen, S.-L., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Chen, S.-L. (2004). Research Paparazzi in Cyberspace: The Voices of the Researched. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 157–178). P. Lang.

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Lathan, H. S., Kwan, A., Takats, C., Tanner, J. P., Wormer, R., Romero, D., & Jones, H. E. (2023). Ethical considerations and methodological uses of Facebook data in public health research: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 322, 115807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115807

Lee, S. S.-J. (2017). Studying “Friends”: The Ethics of Using Social Media as Research Platforms. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3)(1–2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1288969

Legewie, N., & Nassauer, A. (2018). YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st Century Online Video Research and Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3130

Möhring, W., & Schlütz, D. (2022). CCS fordert der Community forschungsethische Reflexion ab. Aviso, 75(2), 9–10.

Markham, A. N., Tiidenberg, K., & Herman, A. (2018). Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research—Introduction. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 205630511878450. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118784502

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-017

Marwick, A. E., Blackwell, L., & Lo, K. (2016). Best Practices for Conducting Risky Research and Protecting Yourself from Online Harassment. Data & Society Research Institute.

Massanari, A. (2017). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807

McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). Playing a Good Game: Ethical Issues in Researching MMOGs and Virtual Worlds. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics (IJIRE), 2(1), 5–37.

McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Casebased Process. Peter Lang. DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.003

McKee, H., & Porter, J. E. (2008). The Ethics of Digital Writing Research: A Rhetorical Approach. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 711–749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457031

Murphy, J., Link, M. W., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C. L., Dean, E., Stern, M., Pasek, J., Cohen, J., Callegaro, M., & Harwood, P. (2014). Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu053

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Nissenbaum, H. (2011). A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online. Daedalus, 140(4), 32–48. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567042

Östman, S., & Turtiainen, R. (2016). From Research Ethics to Researching Ethics in an Online Specific Context. Media and Communication, 4(4), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.571

Özkula, S. M. (2020). The Issue of “Context”: Data, Culture, and Commercial Context in Social Media Ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619874646

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Eds.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 61–85). https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.0

Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846

Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise Consent Forms Appreciated—Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453

Prictor, M., Lewis, M. A., Newson, A. J., Haas, M., Baba, S., Kim, H., Kokado, M., Minari, J., Molnár-Gábor, F., Yamamoto, B., Kaye, J., & Teare, H. J. A. (2019). Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619887073

Prinzing, M., Schlütz, D., Kaufmann, K., Kreissl, J., & Rakebrand, T. (2020). Ethikkompetenz als Querschnittsaufgabe. Publizistik, 65, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00578-4

Quinton, S., & Reynolds, N. (2017). The Changing Roles of Researchers and Participants in Digital and Social Media Research: Ethics Challenges and Forward Directions. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 53–78). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002003

Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2/3), 251–269. Communication & Mass Media Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=123562776&site=ehost-live

Rau, J., Münch, F., & Asli, M. (2021). SOCRATES: Social Media Research Assessment Template for Ethical Scholarship. 24.

Raykov, M. (2020). Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119893461

Richterich, A. (2020). Tracing controversies in hacker communities: ethical considerations for internet research. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 76–93. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486867

Salganik, M. J. (2017). Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age (Open review edition). Princeton University Press. https://www.bitbybitbook.com/en/introduction/ink-blot/

Salmons, J. (2017). Getting to Yes: Informed Consent in Qualitative Social Media Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 109–134). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002005

Schäwel, J., Frener, R., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2021). Learning by doing oder doing by learning? Die Wechselwirkung zwischen Online- Privatheitskompetenz und Datenschutzverhalten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 69(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-2-221

Schaarschmidt, N. (2018). Media Ethics in Research on Video-Based Mental Health Care. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 137–142). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_14

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2017). Das Rad rollt! Eine Antwort und weiterführende Überlegungen zu dem Diskussionsbeitrag von Nele Heise in diesem Heft. Medien Und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-779

Silverman, H., Strosberg, M., Luna, F., Philpott, S., & Hemmerle, C. A. (2013). An analysis of online courses in research ethics in the Fogarty-sponsored bioethics training programs. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 8(5), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.59

Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group.

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720

Tan, H. C., Ho, J. A., Kumarusamy, R., & Sambasivan, M. (2022). Measuring social desirability bias: Do the full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale matter? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 382–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211046091

Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang.

Vallor, S. (2021). Social Networking and Ethics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/ethics-social-networking/

Van Baalen, S. (2018). ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750312

Van Schie, G., Westra, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2017). Get Your Hands Dirty: Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society Studying Culture through Data (pp. 183–200). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-016

Venema, R., Pfurtscheller, D., & Lobinger, K. (2020). Doing Visual Analysis Online. Forschungsethische Herausforderungen und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Analyse vernetzter Bilder. In C. Brantner, G. Götzenbrucker, K. Lobinger, & M. Schreiber (Eds.), Vernetzte Bilder: Visuelle Kommunikation in Sozialen Medien (pp. 288–310). von Halem.

Vitak, J., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2016). Beyond the Belmont Principles: Ethical Challenges, Practices, and Beliefs in the Online Data Research Community. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 941–953. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820078

Weller, K. (2019). Big Data & New Data: Ein Ausblick auf die Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Social-Media-Inhalten als neue Art von Forschungsdaten. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (p. pp 193-210). Verlag Barbara Budrich. 10.3224/84742233.12

Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140

Willis, R. (2019). Observations online: Finding the ethical boundaries of Facebook research. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117740176

Wimmer, R. D. (2011). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick, Mass media research: an introduction (9th ed, pp. 64–81). Cengage- Wadsworth.

Woodfield, K., & Iphofen, R. (2017). Introduction to Volume 2: The Ethics of Online Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 1–12). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002013

Ziegele, M., & Quiring, O. (2011). Privacy in Social Network Sites. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online (pp. 175–189). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_13

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

franzke, aline shakti, Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. M. (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers.

Online-Forschung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende