Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Probanden

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707

Akbaba, Y., & Wagner, C. (2021). Zur Reproduktion von Rassismus forschen: Über widersprüchliche ethische Ansprüche, Positionierungen und Loyalitäten. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 243–254). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Aryani, A. (2015). Data Description Registry Interoperability WG: Interlinking Method and Specification of Cross-Platform Discovery. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00003

Baard, P., & Sandin, P. (2022). Principlism and citizen science: the possibilities and limitations of principlism for guiding responsible citizen science conduct. Research Ethics, 174701612211165. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221116558

Barnes, S. B. (2004). Issues of Attribution and Identification in Online Social Research. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 203–222). P. Lang.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/filmuniversitaet/detail.action?docID=5763592

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Bender, J. L., Cyr, A. B., Arbuckle, L., & Ferris, L. E. (2017). Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7029

Benner, A., & Löhe, J. (2021). Forschungsethische und datenschutzrechtliche Aspekte der informierten Einwilligung als Audioaufnahme. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 205–216). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Buchanan, E. A., & Zimmer, M. (2021, January). Internet research ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

Burbules, N. C. (2009). Privacy and New Technologies: The Limits of Traditional Research Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 537–549). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n34

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611

Colnerud, G. (2013). Brief report: ethical problems in research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.37

Colnerud, G. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study. Research Ethics, 10(4), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016114552339

Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.678

Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369

Crawford, S., Hokke, S., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., & Hackworth, N. (2019). “It’s not black and white”: Public health researchers’ and ethics committees’ perceptions of engaging research participants online. Internet Research, 29(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2017-0278

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dove, E. S., & Garattini, C. (2018). Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition. Research Ethics, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117711972

Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011

Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Participatory Research: Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7

Frieters-Reermann, N., Klomann, V., Genenger-Stricker, M., & Sylla, N. (2021). „Wir sind nicht dein nächstes Forschungsprojekt!“ – Kritische Reflexionen zu Ethik, Methodik und Machtverhältnissen in Forschungsprozessen im Kontext von Bildung und Migration. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 255–267). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Gelinas, L., Pierce, R., Winkler, S., Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., & Bierer, B. E. (2017). Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1276644

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Golla, S., & Bäcker, M. (2020). Handreichung Datenschutz (2. vollst. überarb. Aufl.) (p. 40). RatSWD. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.50

Guenther, K. M. (2009). The politics of names: Rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337872

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Bennetts, S. K., Nicholson, J. M., Keyzer, P., Lucke, J., Zion, L., & Crawford, S. B. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619854629

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Jackson, J. L., & Larson, E. (2016). Prevalence and commonalities of informed consent templates for biomedical research. Research Ethics, 12(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649995

Kneuper, R. (2022). Anonymisierte Daten brauchen keinen Datenschutz – wirklich nicht? In M. Friedewald, M. Kreutzer, & M. Hansen (Eds.), Selbstbestimmung, Privatheit und Datenschutz (pp. 171–188). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33306-5_9

Laas, K., Taylor, S., Miller, C. Z., Brey, E. M., & Hildt, E. (2021). Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1910503

MacNeil, S. D., & Fernandez, C. V. (2006). Offering results to research participants. BMJ, 332(7535), 188–189. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7535.188

Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211

Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Msoroka, M. S., & Amundsen, D. (2018). One size fits not quite all: Universal research ethics with diversity. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739939

Murray, T. H. (1980). Learning to deceive. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 367–370). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-36/learning-deceive-thomas-murray

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Phillips, L. G., & Zavros, A. (2012). Researchers as participants, participants as researchers. In W. Midgley, P. A. Danaher, & M. Baguley (Eds.), The role of participants in education research: ethics, epistemologies, and methods (pp. 52–63). Routledge.

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). (2020). Datenerhebung mit neuer Informationstechnologie. Empfehlungen zu Datenqualität und -management, Forschungsethik und Datenschutz (6 (6); RatSWD Output 6 (6)). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.47

Redline, C., & Tuttle, A. D. (2022). In an Era of Enhanced Cybersecurity: The Effect of Disclosing a Third Party’s Role in Confidentiality Pledges on Response Propensity. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smac009

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Salmons, J. (2017). Getting to Yes: Informed Consent in Qualitative Social Media Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 109–134). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002005

Sarangi, S. (2015). Communication research ethics and some paradoxes in qualitative inquiry. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice, 12(1), 94–121. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.36885

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004

Swirsky, E. S., Hoop, J. G., & Labott, S. (2014). Using Social Media in Research: New Ethics for a New Meme? American Journal of Bioethics, 14(10), 60–61. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.948302

Szala-Meneok, K. (2009). Ethical Research With Older Adults. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 507–518). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n32

Taylor, S. J. (1987). Observing abuse: professional ethics and personal morality in field research. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 371–388). Ashgate. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00988991.pdf

Theiss, J. D., Hobbs, W. B., Giordano, P. J., & Brunson, O. M. (2014). Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540593

Tsan, M.-F., & Van Hook, H. (2022). Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(4), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221094407

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395

Weber, D. (2021). Forschungsprozesse als ethische Lernprozesse. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 61–80). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Wesselmann, C., & Schallenberger, C. (2021). Herausforderungen beim Feldzugang zu Menschen mit Lernschwierigkeiten mit Blick auf informierte Einwilligung. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 181–192). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Wiles, R., Crow, G., Charles, V., & Heath, S. (2007). Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following Rules or Striking Balances? Sociological Research Online, 12(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1208

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Probanden

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende