Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Methoden

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Aryani, A. (2015). Data Description Registry Interoperability WG: Interlinking Method and Specification of Cross-Platform Discovery. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00003

Barnes, C. (2009). An Ethical Agenda in Disability Research: Rhetoric or Reality? In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 458–473). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n29

Bober, M. (2004). Virtual Youth Research: An Exploration of Methodologies and Ethical Dilemmas from a British Perspective (p. 29). London School of Economics and Political Science. www.igi-global.com/chapter/virtual-youth-research/28305

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Buchanan, E. A., & Hvizdak, E. E. (2009). Online Survey Tools: Ethical and Methodological Concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 4(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.37

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Combe, C. G. (2020). Research Ethics in Data. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (pp. 1–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_13-1

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

De Oliveira, L. L. H., Vissoci, J. R. N., Machado, W. de L., Rodrigues, C. G., & Limkakeng, A. T. (2017). Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617737163

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Ed.). (2013). Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. In Sicherung Guter Wissenschaftlicher Praxis (2. ergänzte Auflage, pp. 1–109). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679188.oth1

Dwork, C. (2014). Differential Privacy: A Cryptographic Approach to Private Data Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 296-322). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.018

Eble, M., Ziegele, M., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Forschung in geschlossenen Plattformen des Social Web. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 123–149). Herbert von Halem.

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Engel, U., Quan-Haase, A., Liu, S. X., & Lyberg, L. (2021). Handbook of Computational Social Science, Volume 1: Theory, Case Studies and Ethics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003024583

Erdos, D. (2012). CONSTRUCTING THE LABYRINTH. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 104–123. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.630403

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

Eynon, R., Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2009). New Techniques in Online Research: Challenges for Research Ethics. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 4(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140903000308

Faied, H. A. (2018). Perception of Digital Methods’ Ethics among Egyptian Researchers. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 89–94). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_7

Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

Franken, L. (2022). Digitale Daten und Methoden als Erweiterung qualitativer Forschungsprozesse. Herausforderungen und Potenziale aus den Digital Humanities und Computational Social Sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-22.2.3818

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Goerge, L. (2020). The Ethics of Research and Indigenous Peoples. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_31-1

Goldgruber, E., Ausserhofer, J., Hornmoen, H., Steensen, S., Backholm, K., Reimerth, G., Frey, E., Ottosen, R., & McInnes, C. J. (2018). Reflecting on Ethics in the Investigation of Online Communication during Emergencies. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 157-163). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_17

Guhl, J., Marsh, O., & Tuck, H. (2022). Researching the Evolving Online Ecosystem: Barriers, Methods and Future Challenges. Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD).

Hedges, D., & Brown, B. L. (2009). Use and Misuse of Quantitative Methods: Data Collection, Calculation, and Presentation. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 373–387). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n24

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Helfferich, C. (Ed.). (2011). Forschungsethik, Datenschutzbestimmungen und Einwilligungserklärung. In Die Qualität qualitativer Daten Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (pp. 190–192). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4_6

Hofmann, R. (2018). Queering quantitative research: dealing with processes of categorization in EDI research. In L. A. E. Booysen, R. Bendl, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Diversity Management, Equality and Inclusion at Work (pp. 372–389). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476084.00026

Iphofen, R. (2020). Ethical Issues in Research Methods. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_54-1

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Johns, M. D., Chen, S.-L., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.

Johnson, J. (1991). Some Critical Attributes of Applied Communication Research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19(4), 340–346. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889109365313

Jouhki, J., Lauk, E., Penttinen, M., Sormanen, N., & Uskali, T. (2016). Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.579

Kaufmann, K. (2018). Mit Kriegsflüchtlingen über ihre Smartphone-Nutzung auf der Flucht sprechen: Eine forschungsethische (Selbst-)Reflexion. In M. Prinzing, M. Schröder, & N. Köberer (Eds.), Migration, Integration, Inklusion. Medienethische Potenziale für die digitale Mediengesellschaft (pp. 135–150). Nomos.

Kingston, A. K. (2019). Feminist Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_64-1

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Landwehr, C. (2014). Engineered Controls for Dealing with Big Data. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 211-233). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.013

Larsson, A. O. (2016). Studying Big Data – ethical and methodological considerations. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 141–156). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Mahrt, M., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The Value of Big Data in Digital Media Research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761700

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2015). Measuring voluntariness of consent to research: an instrument review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615571552

Maring, M. (Ed.). (2005). Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch. Lit.

Markham, A. (2006). Ethic as Method, Method as Ethic: A Case for Reflexivity in Qualitative ICT Research. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.15.2.37

Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971

Mooney-Somers, J., & Olsen, A. (2017). Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677636

Murphy, J., Link, M. W., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C. L., Dean, E., Stern, M., Pasek, J., Cohen, J., Callegaro, M., & Harwood, P. (2014). Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu053

Netscher, S., & Trixa, J. (2019). Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Sekundäranalyse. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 135–150). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Newton, J. H. (2009). Visual Representation of People and Information: Translating Lives Into Numbers, Words, and Images as Research Data. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. pp 353-372). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n23

Nind, M., Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., & Crow, G. (2012). Methodological innovation and research ethics: forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qualitative Research, 13(6), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112455042

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

O’Sullivan, R. (2020). Older Citizens’ Involvement in Aging Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_29-2

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

OECD. (2018). Frascati-Handbuch 2015: Leitlinien für die Erhebung und Meldung von Daten über Forschung und experimentelle Entwicklung. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264291638-de

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Peters, Y., Nehls, P., & Thimm, C. (2023). Plattformforschung mit Instagram-Daten – Eine Übersicht über analytische Zugänge, digitale Erhebungsverfahren und forschungsethische Perspektiven in Zeiten der APIcalypse. Publizistik, 68(2–3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-023-00786-8

Pickles, J. (2017). Contamination of overt data with covert data. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117721281

Podschuweit, N. (2021). Medieninhalte im Gespräch Eine Feldstudie (N. Podschuweit, Ed.; 1st ed.). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34872-4

Prinzing, M., Schlütz, D., Kaufmann, K., Kreissl, J., & Rakebrand, T. (2020). Ethikkompetenz als Querschnittsaufgabe. Publizistik, 65, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00578-4

Rakebrand, T. (2019). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik als Teilbereich kritischen Denkens: Potenziale und Herausforderungen für die Lehrpraxis am Beispiel der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Die Hochschullehre: Interdisziplinäre Zeitschrift Für Studium Und Lehre, 5(1), 985−996. http://www.hochschullehre.org/wp-content/files/die_hochschullehre_2019_Centeno_Garcia_Kenneweg_Themenheft_Kritisch_Denken_Lernen.pdf

Rakebrand, T. (2020). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik als Schlüsselkompetenz Studierender. Herausforderungen und Potenziale für den systematischen Einbezug als Ausbildungsinhalt. HDS-Journal, 12–18. https://ul.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A72556/attachment/ATT-0/

Rakebrand, T., & Schlütz, D. (2019). Forschungsethik in der kommunikations- und medienwissenschaftlichen Hochschullehre. Erkenntnisse aus der Praxis. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 67(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2019-2-187

Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383696

Rekus, J. (2005). Fachunterricht und Ethik. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, p. pp.141-152). LIT Verlag.

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Sawyer, J. S., Wilner, L. L., & Brewster, M. E. (2017). Ethics in Gender Research. In K. L. Nadal (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender (pp. 506–508). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384269.n170

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2017). Das Rad rollt! Eine Antwort und weiterführende Überlegungen zu dem Diskussionsbeitrag von Nele Heise in diesem Heft. Medien Und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-779

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Schwartz, R. (2009). On Ethics in Social Science Research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Spear (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 189–197). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n12

Singer, E. (1984). Public Reactions to Some Ethical Issues of Social Research: Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 501–509. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1086/208986

Sponholz, G. (Ed.). (2019). Curriculum für Lehrveranstaltungen zur guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis - Erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung. https://ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-Curriculum-f%C3%BCr-Lehrveranstaltungen-zur-GWP.pdf

Staksrud, E. (2016). Counting children On research methodology, ethics and policy development. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 98–121). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Stern, J. E., & Elliott, D. (1997). The ethics of scientific research : A guidebook for course development. 75. https://digital.stpetersburg.usf.edu/fac_publications/1910

Strandburg, K. (2014). Monitoring, Datafication, and Consent: Legal Approaches to Privacy in the Big Data Context. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 5-43). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107590205.003

Szala-Meneok, K. (2009). Ethical Research With Older Adults. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 507–518). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n32

Vermeulen, I., & Hartmann, T. (2015). Questionable Research and Publication Practices in Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331

Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9

Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395

Walzenbach, S., Burton, J., Couper, M. P., Crossley, T. F., & JÄckle, A. (2023). Experiments on Multiple Requests for Consent to Data Linkage in Surveys. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 11(3), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab053

Warfield, K., Hoholuk, J., Vincent, B., & Camargo, A. D. (2019). Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2068–2086. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837715

Wilbanks, J. (2014). Portable Approaches to Informed Consent and Open Data. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 234-252). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.014

Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310378979

Woodfield, K. (Ed.). (2017). The Ethics of Online Research. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/S2398-6018201802

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Zeni, J. (2009). Ethics and the ‘Personal’ in Action Research. In B. Somekh & S. E. Noffke (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 254–265). Sage.

Methoden

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende