Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Richtlinien

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Alexander, M., & Reed Williams, W. (2020). A Guidebook for Teaching Selected Responsible Conduct of Research Topics to a Culturally Diverse Trainee Group.

Altmeppen, K.-D. (2016). Ethik ist kein Springteufel. Warum Ethik und Kritik in der Wissenschaft keine Gegensätze sind. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-1-114

Annette, M., & Elizabeth, B. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Barnes, S. B. (2004). Issues of Attribution and Identification in Online Social Research. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 203–222). P. Lang.

Bezjak, S., Clyburne-Sherin, A., Conzett, P., Fernandes, P., Görögh, E., Helbig, K., Kramer, B., Labastida, I., Niemeyer, K., Psomopoulos, F., Ross-Hellauer, T., Schneider, R., Tennant, J., Verbakel, E., Brinken, H., & Heller, L. (2018). The Open Science Training Handbook.

Brey, P., Shelley-Egan, C., Rodrigues, R., & Jansen, P. (2017). The Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation – A Reflection on the State of the Art (Based on Findings of the SATORI Project). In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 185–198). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001015

Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021). The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720983865. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720983865

Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (Ed.). (2020). Praxisleitfaden für Integrität und Ethik in der Wissenschaft. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. https://forschungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_forschungsservice/Formulare_Info_Stipendien/Praxisleitfaden_fuer_Integritaet_und_Ethik_in_der_Wissenschaft_Stand_29-9-2020_Final.pdf

COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). (2019). COPE Discussion Document: Authorship. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.3

Carpentier, R., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Protecting Participants in Clinical Trials Through Research Ethics Review. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_3-1

Charlesworth, A. (2012). Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Ethical Review Committees. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 85–103. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.637572

Chatfield, K., & Dove, E. (2023). Clarifying our policy on requiring ethics approval in submitted manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231161402

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186

Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011

Ess, C. (2016). New selves, new research ethics? In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 48–76). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Ess, C. (2020). Digital Media Ethics. Wiley & Sons.

Fiesler, C., Beard, N., & Keegan, B. C. (2020). No Robots, Spiders, or Scrapers: Legal and Ethical Regulation of Data Collection Methods in Social Media Terms of Service. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 187–196. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/7290

Fisher, C. B., Wertz, F. J., & Goodman, S. J. (2009). Graduate Training in Responsible Conduct of Social Science Research: The Role of Mentors and Departmental Climate. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 550–564). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n35

Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Participatory Research: Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7

Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. (2013). Case Studies for Ethics in Academic Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452269986

Glasziou, P., & Chalmers, I. (2004). Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ, 328, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121

Goldgruber, E., Ausserhofer, J., Hornmoen, H., Steensen, S., Backholm, K., Reimerth, G., Frey, E., Ottosen, R., & McInnes, C. J. (2018). Reflecting on Ethics in the Investigation of Online Communication during Emergencies. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 157-163). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_17

Golla, S. J., Hofmann, H., & Bäcker, M. (2018). Connecting the Dots: Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung in Sozialen Online-Medien im Lichte von DS-GVO und BDSG-neu. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD, 42(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-018-0900-x

Gorup, M. (2017). The Respect Project in the Rear-View Mirror: Past, Present and Future of International Professional and Ethics Guidelines for Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 157–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001013

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3

Heimer, C. A., & Petty, J. (2010). Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454

Heinrichs, J.-H., & Lanzerath, D. (2017). Nichtmedizinische Forschung am Menschen – Probandenschutz jenseits der Medizin. Forschung, 3+4, 90–94.

Heise, N. (2011). „Alles neu macht das Netz?“ – Ethik der Internetforschung Eine qualitativ-heuristische Befragungsstudie. In T. Köhler (Ed.), Wissensgemeinschaften : Digitale Medien – Öffnung und Offenheit in Forschung und Lehre. (p. pp.339-341). Waxmann Verlag. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-76473

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Iphofen, R. (2017). Achieving Consensus in Research Ethics: An Interim Conclusion and Some Recommendations. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 211–225). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001017

Iphofen, R. (2017). The ‘Ethics Rupture’ and the New Brunswick Declaration. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 151–155). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001012

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Israel, M. (2019). Organizing and Contesting Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_63-1

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Chen, S.-L. (2004). Research Paparazzi in Cyberspace: The Voices of the Researched. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 157–178). P. Lang.

Johnson, J. (1991). Some Critical Attributes of Applied Communication Research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19(4), 340–346. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889109365313

Jonas, H. (1969). Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (p. pp.11-18). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-4/philosophical-reflections-experimenting-human-subjects-hans-jonas?context=ubx&refId=915ef2d1-ffbb-458a-8294-e915b2643a4d

Kneuper, R. (2022). Anonymisierte Daten brauchen keinen Datenschutz – wirklich nicht? In M. Friedewald, M. Kreutzer, & M. Hansen (Eds.), Selbstbestimmung, Privatheit und Datenschutz (pp. 171–188). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33306-5_9

Kritikos, M. (2017). Safeguarding Research Integrity in Europe: An Object of Increasing Legal Attention. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 199–210). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001016

Larsson, A. O. (2016). Studying Big Data – ethical and methodological considerations. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 141–156). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Laurijssen, S. J., Van Der Graaf, R., Van Dijk, W. B., Schuit, E., Groenwold, R. H., Grobbee, D. E., & De Vries, M. C. (2022). When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review. Clinical Trials, 19(5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745221103567

Leslie, D. (2023). The Ethics of Computational Social Science. In E. Bertoni, M. Fontana, L. Gabrielli, S. Signorelli, & M. Vespe (Eds.), Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy (pp. 57–104). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_4

Lombardo, G. (2017). The Social Sciences and Ethical Protocols and Standards for Research in Social Sciences Today. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 177–184). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001014

Losch, M. E. (2008). Informed Consent. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Vol. 1, pp. 335–337). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n223

Makola, Z., & Ntoyanto-Tyatyantsi, N. (2023). Post Graduate Students’ Experiences with Research Ethics: A South African Perspective. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646231188004. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646231188004

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (AoIR Ethical Decision-Making, p. 19). http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Medvecky, F., & Leach, J. (2019). An Ethics of Science Communication. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32116-1

Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. LEI. https://edepot.wur.nl/216589

Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971

Morgenstern-Einenkel, A., & Rädiker, S. (2021). Im Team arbeiten mit MAXQDA. MAXQDA Press. https://doi.org/10.36192/978-3-948768041

Ntseane, P. G. (2009). The Ethics of the Researcher-Subject Relationship: Experiences From the Field. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 295–307). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n19

Östman, S., & Turtiainen, R. (2016). From Research Ethics to Researching Ethics in an Online Specific Context. Media and Communication, 4(4), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.571

Petillion, W., Melrose, S., Moore, S. L., & Nuttgens, S. (2017). Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), pp 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677635

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1

Resnik, D. (2023). Disclosing and managing non-financial conflicts of interest in scientific publications. Research Ethics, 19(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221148387

Resnik, D. B. (2005). Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010470

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3

Sarah, Banks, S., & Manners, P. (2012). Community-based participatory research: A guide to ethical principles and practice. (p. 16). Durham University. http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/beacon/CBPREthicsGuidewebNovember20121.pdf

Schaar, K. (2017). Die informierte Einwilligung als Voraussetzung für die (Nach-)nutzung von Forschungsdaten. RatSWD Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.12

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Staksrud, E., Bang, K. J., Bomann-Larsen, L., Fretheim, K., Granaas, R. C., Berg Harpviken, K., Østbø Haugen, H., Jakobsen, K. A., Johnsen, R., Kolstad, I., Hoel Lie, M., Strømmen Lile, H., Nevøy, A., Klæboe Nilsen, T., Skilbrei, M.-L., & Enebakk, V. (2019). A Guide to Internet Research Ethics. The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH).

Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group.

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Sutrop, M., Prader, M.-L., & Juurik, M. (2020). Research Ethics Codes and Guidelines. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_2-1

Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang.

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. The University of Aberdeen. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Van Baalen, S. (2018). ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750312

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Wiles, R., Crow, G., Charles, V., & Heath, S. (2007). Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following Rules or Striking Balances? Sociological Research Online, 12(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1208

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage.

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). (2017). WZB Research Ethics Policy and Procedures. Forschung, 3+4, 107–112.

Wood, L., & Kahts-Kramer, S. (2023). ‘But how will you ensure the objectivity of the researcher?’ Guidelines to address possible misconceptions about the ethical imperatives of community-based research. Research Ethics, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221135882

Yalcintas, A., & Selcuk, I. S. (2016). Research Ethics Education in Economics. Review of Social Economy, 74(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2015.1100847

Yeo-Teh, N. S. L., & Tang, B. L. (2021). Research ethics courses as a vaccination against a toxic research environment or culture. Research Ethics, 17(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120926686

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Zimmerman, S. V. (2017). The Canadian Experience: A Response to ‘Developing Standards for Research Practice: Some Issues for Consideration’ by James Parry. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 103–109). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001009

franzke, aline shakti, Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. M. (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers.

franzke, aline shakti, Muis, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5

Richtlinien

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende